Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Google
Google

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekGoogle
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025's score of 14.5.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has a 1,048,576 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 supports vision.