Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Speed
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2024

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.39/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's score of 11.9.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not support vision.