Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Speed
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.12 Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.75$0.39 Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 38% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Providers

SambaNova $0.15 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.20
DeepInfra $0.21
SiliconFlow $0.27
Novita $0.27

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.12 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.30
Novita $0.38
Hyperbolic $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
6
DeepSeek V3.1 Wins
0
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.015.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
28.411.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
49.714.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.372.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
73.549.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
57.727.6
Aider
Real-world code editing
-65.4-
AIME
Competition math
-16.0-
DeepSeek V3.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1
32,768
tokens
Max output: 7,168 tokens
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s45.6 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.11s
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2024

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 72B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.39/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's score of 11.9.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not support vision.