Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1
Speed
DeepSeek V3.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 Coder 3B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.10 Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.75$0.10 Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.10$0.05 Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct is 67% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Providers

No provider data available

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
DeepSeek V3.1 Wins
0
Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 Coder 3B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.1--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
28.4--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
49.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.3--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
73.5--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
57.7--
DeepSeek V3.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1
32,768
tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct
N/A
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 Coder 3B InstructWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.00sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Unknown

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct's score of N/A.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct has a unknown token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct does not support vision.
Advertise with us