Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Speed
DeepSeek V3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 does not support vision.