Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's score of 22.9.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.