Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek Coder 1.3B BaseQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek Coder 1.3B BaseQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base has a 16,384 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.