Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Reka

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Reka Flash 3

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Reka Flash 3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Reka Flash 3
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
Context Window
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
Speed
Reka Flash 3

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BReka Flash 3
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BReka Flash 3
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekReka
ReleasedUnknownMar 2025

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B Modalities

Input
Output

Reka Flash 3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Reka Flash 3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Reka Flash 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 8.9, compared to DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B's score of 7.8.
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has a 128,000 token context window, while Reka Flash 3 has a 65,536 token context window.