Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Reka

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Reka Flash 3

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Reka Flash 3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Reka Flash 3
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
Reka Flash 3

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexReka Flash 3
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexReka Flash 3
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIReka
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2025

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Reka Flash 3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Compare Reka Flash 3 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Reka Flash 3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Reka Flash 3 has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Reka Flash 3's score of 8.9.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Reka Flash 3 has a 65,536 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. Reka Flash 3 does not support vision.