Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

R1 0528 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

R1 0528 wins:

  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 0528Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 0528Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedMay 2025Feb 2026

R1 0528 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper input pricing at $0.39/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to R1 0528's score of 24.0.
R1 0528 has a 163,840 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
R1 0528 does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.