Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs DeepSeek V3.2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2
Speed
DeepSeek V3.2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 1.5BDeepSeek V3.2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 1.5BDeepSeek V3.2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekDeepseek
ReleasedUnknownDec 2025

R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B Modalities

Input
Output

DeepSeek V3.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B has a 131,072 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.2 has a 163,840 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.2 does not support vision.