Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 14B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 14BQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 14BQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

R1 Distill Qwen 14B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 Distill Qwen 14B has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 14B has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
R1 Distill Qwen 14B has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 14B does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.