Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Google
Google

R1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math

Gemini 2.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
R1
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1Gemini 2.5 FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.70$0.30 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$2.50Tie
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.03 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cache Write (per 1M)N/A$0.08 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.5 Flash is 26% cheaper overall.

R1 Providers

Vercel $0.55 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.70
Azure $1.49
Together $3.00

Gemini 2.5 Flash Providers

Vercel $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
7
R1 Wins
1
Gemini 2.5 Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1Gemini 2.5 FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
23.121.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
15.917.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
68.060.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
84.480.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
70.868.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
61.749.5
Aider
Real-world code editing
64.055.1
AIME
Competition math
68.350.0
R1 shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1
64,000
tokens
Max output: 16,000 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 94% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricR1Gemini 2.5 FlashWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s246.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.47s
Gemini 2.5 Flash responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1Gemini 2.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1Gemini 2.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekGoogle
ReleasedJan 2025Jun 2025

R1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemini 2.5 Flash Modalities

Input
fileimagetextaudiovideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 with:

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. R1 has cheaper output pricing at $2.50/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 17.8, compared to R1's score of 15.9.
R1 has a 64,000 token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window.
R1 does not support vision. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports vision.