Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Google
Google

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Speed
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemma 2 27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekGoogle
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2024

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.