Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's score of 31.9.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.