Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Speed
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.5-122B-A10BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.21$0.26 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.79$2.08 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.12$0.30 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 50% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Wins
2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.5-122B-A10BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.535.9
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
31.931.6-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
53.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.6--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
75.182.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
52.9--
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
163,840
tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
262,144
tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 38% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.5-122B-A10BWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s146.6 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.03s
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.5-122B-A10B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with:

Compare Qwen3.5-122B-A10B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's score of 31.6.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports vision.