Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Google
Google

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Speed
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeGemma 2 27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.65 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$0.65 Gemma 2 27B
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.20N/A DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is 8% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

No provider data available

Gemma 2 27B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins
1
Gemma 2 27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeGemma 2 27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
29.436.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
96.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.338.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
87.116.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
89.6--
Aider
Real-world code editing
-36.1-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-49.3-
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 95% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeGemma 2 27BWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.00sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeGemma 2 27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekGoogle
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2024

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.