Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Google
Google

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Gemma 4 31B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Gemma 4 31B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeGemma 4 31B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeGemma 4 31B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekGoogle
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale's score of 37.9.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window, while Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision. Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision.