Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeQwen3.5-27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.20 Qwen3.5-27B
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$1.56 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.20$0.27 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3.5-27B is 11% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3.5-27B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
2
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins
1
Qwen3.5-27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeQwen3.5-27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
29.437.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.933.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
96.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.3--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
87.184.2
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
89.6--
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B
262,144
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B has a 38% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeQwen3.5-27BWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s92.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.32s
Qwen3.5-27B responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to Qwen3.5-27B's score of 33.4.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.