Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.38/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 34.6, compared to Qwen3.5-27B's score of 33.4.
DeepSeek V3.2 has a 163,840 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.