Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

CodeGemma 2B vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

CodeGemma 2B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
CodeGemma 2B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodeGemma 2BMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCodeGemma 2BMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

CodeGemma 2B Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

CodeGemma 2B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. CodeGemma 2B has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
CodeGemma 2B has a 8,192 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
CodeGemma 2B does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.