Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Speed
Gemini 2.0 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 FlashGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 FlashGemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedFeb 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 2.0 Flash Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemini 2.0 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.6, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash supports vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.