Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 FlashMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 FlashMiniMax M2.5
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedFeb 2025Feb 2026

Gemini 2.0 Flash Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's score of 13.6.
Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash supports vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.