Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 FlashMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 FlashMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2025Dec 2025

Gemini 2.0 Flash Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's score of 13.6.
Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.