Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Z-ai

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 FlashGLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 FlashGLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2025Mar 2026

Gemini 2.0 Flash Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's score of 13.6.
Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.