Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Modalities

Input
textimageaudiovideo
Output
textimage

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental supports vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.