Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$10.50 Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$84.00 Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental is 99% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Providers

No provider data available

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Wins
4
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
16.851.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-48.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-99.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
78.287.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
63.690.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
21.088.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
69.9--
AIME
Competition math
30.0--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
N/A
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s72.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s119.13s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownDec 2025

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has a unknown token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental does not support vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.
Advertise with us