Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash LiteNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash LiteNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedFeb 2025Unknown

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite with:

Compare Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.2, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has a unknown token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite supports vision. Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B does not support vision.