Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs GPT-OSS-120b

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.04 GPT-OSS-120b
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.19 GPT-OSS-120b
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-OSS-120b is 42% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Providers

Google AI Studio $0.07 (Cheapest)
Google $0.07 (Cheapest)

GPT-OSS-120b Providers

Chutes $0.04 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.05
Novita $0.05
Clarifai $0.09
Google $0.09

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Wins
4
GPT-OSS-120b Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.733.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-28.6-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-93.4-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
72.480.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
53.578.2
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
18.587.8
Aider
Real-world code editing
-41.8-
AIME
Competition math
27.7--
GPT-OSS-120b significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 8,192 tokens
GPT-OSS-120b
131,072
tokens
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s311.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.47s
GPT-OSS-120b responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-OSS-120b
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-OSS-120b
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedFeb 2025Aug 2025

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite with:

Compare GPT-OSS-120b with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.19/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.6, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite supports vision. GPT-OSS-120b does not support vision.