Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2025Dec 2025

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.