Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) vs GPT-5 Mini

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5 Mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GPT-5 Mini
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Mini
Context Window
GPT-5 Mini
Speed
GPT-5 Mini

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5 MiniWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.25 GPT-5 Mini
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$2.00 GPT-5 Mini
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$25000.00 GPT-5 Mini
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-5 Mini is 19% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Providers

Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

GPT-5 Mini Providers

OpenAI $0.25 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.25 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Wins
0
GPT-5 Mini Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5 MiniWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-41.0-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-35.3-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-90.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-83.7-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-82.8-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-83.8-
GPT-5 Mini significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
GPT-5 Mini
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5 Mini has a 92% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5 MiniWinner
Tokens/secondN/A126.7 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A60.75s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5 Mini
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5 Mini
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedOct 2025Aug 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

GPT-5 Mini Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) with:

Compare GPT-5 Mini with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5 Mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. GPT-5 Mini has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
GPT-5 Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.3, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)'s score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window, while GPT-5 Mini has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) supports vision. GPT-5 Mini supports vision.