Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025Gemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025Gemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 supports vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.