Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025MiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025MiniMax M2.1
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedSep 2025Dec 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025's score of 14.5.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 supports vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.