Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025MiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.09 MiMo-V2-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)$10000.00$45000.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiMo-V2-Flash is 20% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 Providers

Google AI Studio $0.10 (Cheapest)
Google $0.10 (Cheapest)

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 Wins
4
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025MiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
19.430.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
14.525.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
46.767.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
79.674.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
65.165.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
64.140.2
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025MiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second368.2 tok/s142.6 tok/s
Time to First Token0.23s1.25s
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 responds 158% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025MiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025MiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedSep 2025Dec 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025's score of 14.5.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.