Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemma 2 27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.65 Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.65 Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Cache Read (per 1M)$10000.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 73% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Providers

Google AI Studio $0.10 (Cheapest)
Google $0.10 (Cheapest)

Gemma 2 27B Providers

NextBit $0.65 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Wins
1
Gemma 2 27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemma 2 27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.536.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
7.4--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
35.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
72.438.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
47.416.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.0--
Aider
Real-world code editing
-36.1-
AIME
Competition math
50.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-49.3-
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Max output: 2,048 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a 99% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemma 2 27BWinner
Tokens/second248.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.28sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 7.4, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports vision. Gemma 2 27B does not support vision.