Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 7.4, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.