Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.09 MiMo-V2-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)$10000.00$45000.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiMo-V2-Flash is 20% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Providers

Google AI Studio $0.10 (Cheapest)
Google $0.10 (Cheapest)

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Wins
5
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.530.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
7.425.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
35.367.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
72.474.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
47.465.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.040.2-
AIME
Competition math
50.0--
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second248.0 tok/s142.6 tok/s
Time to First Token0.28s1.25s
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite responds 74% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedJul 2025Dec 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's score of 7.4.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.