Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedJul 2025Dec 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's score of 7.4.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.