Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 Modalities

Input
textimageaudiovideo
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025's score of 22.1.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 supports vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.