Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-4o-mini

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-4o-mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
GPT-4o-mini
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.15 GPT-4o-mini
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.60 GPT-4o-mini
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.03$0.07 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cache Write (per 1M)$0.08N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-4o-mini is 69% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Providers

Vercel $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

GPT-4o-mini Providers

OpenAI $0.15 (Cheapest)
Vercel $0.15 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.15 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
6
Gemini 2.5 Flash Wins
1
GPT-4o-mini Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
21.112.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
17.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
60.314.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
80.964.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
68.342.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
49.523.4
Aider
Real-world code editing
55.155.6
AIME
Competition math
50.011.7
Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
GPT-4o-mini
128,000
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o-miniWinner
Tokens/second246.2 tok/s53.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s0.56s
Gemini 2.5 Flash responds 361% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o-mini
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o-mini
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 2.5 Flash Modalities

Input
fileimagetextaudiovideo
Output
text

GPT-4o-mini Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash with:

Compare GPT-4o-mini with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-4o-mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. GPT-4o-mini has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 17.8, compared to GPT-4o-mini's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-4o-mini has a 128,000 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash supports vision. GPT-4o-mini supports vision.