Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedJun 2025Mar 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Modalities

Input
fileimagetextaudiovideo
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash's score of 17.8.
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash supports vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.