Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06MiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06MiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedMay 2025Mar 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.