Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 300 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGemma 2 27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.25$0.65 Gemma 2 27B
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$0.65 Gemma 2 27B
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.13N/A Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cache Write (per 1M)$0.38N/A Gemini 2.5 Pro
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 2 27B is 81% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Providers

Google AI Studio $1.00 (Cheapest)
Google $1.25
Vercel $2.50

Gemma 2 27B Providers

NextBit $0.65 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Wins
1
Gemma 2 27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGemma 2 27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
34.636.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
31.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
87.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.238.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.416.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
80.1--
Aider
Real-world code editing
-36.1-
AIME
Competition math
88.7--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-49.3-
Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Pro
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Max output: 2,048 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 99% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGemma 2 27BWinner
Tokens/second126.6 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token25.27sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 ProGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 2.5 Pro Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.65/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision. Gemma 2 27B does not support vision.
Advertise with us