Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 4 31B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 ProGemma 4 31B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGemma 4 31B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedJun 2025Apr 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's score of 31.9.
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision. Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision.