Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 ProMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProMiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedJun 2025Mar 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's score of 31.9.
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.