Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Sponsor Price Per Token Reach 5000+ developers comparing LLM APIs

125 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in January.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.2-CodexWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.25$1.75 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$14.00 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cache Read (per 1M)$125000.00$175000.00 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cache Write (per 1M)$375000.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Pro
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.5 Pro is 29% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Providers

Google AI Studio $1.25 (Cheapest)
Google $1.25 (Cheapest)
Vercel $2.50

GPT-5.2-Codex Providers

OpenAI $1.75 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Pro Wins
0
GPT-5.2-Codex Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.2-CodexWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
34.4--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
31.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
87.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.2--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.4--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
80.1--
AIME
Competition math
88.7--
Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Pro
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
GPT-5.2-Codex
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 62% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.2-CodexWinner
Tokens/second152.3 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token37.94sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedJun 2025Jan 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro with:

Compare GPT-5.2-Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.25/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $10.00/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to GPT-5.2-Codex's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.