Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

101 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Flash Preview wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 3 Flash PreviewGemma 2 27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.50$0.65 Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Output (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.65 Gemma 2 27B
Cache Read (per 1M)$50000.00N/A Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 2 27B is 42% cheaper overall.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Providers

Google AI Studio $0.50 (Cheapest)
Google $0.50 (Cheapest)

Gemma 2 27B Providers

NextBit $0.65 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemini 3 Flash Preview Wins
1
Gemma 2 27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGemma 2 27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
35.136.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
55.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
88.238.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.216.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
79.7--
Aider
Real-world code editing
-36.1-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-49.3-
Gemini 3 Flash Preview significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 3 Flash Preview
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Max output: 2,048 tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview has a 99% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 3 Flash PreviewGemma 2 27BWinner
Tokens/second174.5 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.93sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3 Flash PreviewGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3 Flash PreviewGemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3 Flash Preview with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 3 Flash Preview has cheaper input pricing at $0.50/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.8, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview supports vision. Gemma 2 27B does not support vision.