Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Kimi K2 Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

101 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Flash Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Context Window
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.50$0.40 Kimi K2 Thinking
Output (per 1M tokens)$3.00$1.75 Kimi K2 Thinking
Cache Read (per 1M)$50000.00N/A Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Kimi K2 Thinking is 34% cheaper overall.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Providers

Google AI Studio $0.50 (Cheapest)
Google $0.50 (Cheapest)

Kimi K2 Thinking Providers

Chutes $0.40 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.47
Parasail $0.50
SiliconFlow $0.55
AtlasCloud $0.60

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemini 3 Flash Preview Wins
4
Kimi K2 Thinking Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
35.140.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.834.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
55.794.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
88.284.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.283.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
79.785.3
Kimi K2 Thinking shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 3 Flash Preview
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Tokens/second174.5 tok/s96.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.93s0.57s
Gemini 3 Flash Preview responds 81% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 Thinking
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMoonshotai
ReleasedDec 2025Nov 2025

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3 Flash Preview with:

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Kimi K2 Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $1.75/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.8, compared to Kimi K2 Thinking's score of 34.8.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview supports vision. Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision.