Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3 Pro PreviewLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3 Pro PreviewLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedNov 2025Unknown

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3 Pro Preview with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.60/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper output pricing at $1.80/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 46.5, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's score of N/A.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 128,000 token context window.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview supports vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not support vision.