Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3 Pro PreviewGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3 Pro PreviewGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedNov 2025Aug 2023

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3 Pro Preview with:

Compare GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 3 Pro Preview has cheaper input pricing at $2.00/M tokens. GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 46.5, compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k's score of N/A.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k has a 16,385 token context window.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview supports vision. GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k does not support vision.