Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMiniMax M2.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.25$0.27 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.50$0.95 MiniMax M2.1
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.03$0.03 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Cache Write (per 1M)$0.08N/A Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.1 is 22% cheaper overall.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Providers

No provider data available

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Wins
0
MiniMax M2.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMiniMax M2.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-39.4-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-32.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-82.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.5-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-83.0-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-81.0-
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
1,048,576
tokens
MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a 81% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMiniMax M2.1Winner
Tokens/secondN/A41.7 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A2.07s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMiniMax M2.1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedMar 2026Dec 2025

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Modalities

Input
textimagevideofileaudio
Output
text

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview with:

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's score of N/A.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview supports vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.
Advertise with us