Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.25$10.50 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.50$84.00 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.03N/A Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Cache Write (per 1M)$0.08N/A Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is 98% cheaper overall.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Providers

No provider data available

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Wins
0
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-51.3-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-48.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-99.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-90.3-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-88.9-
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
1,048,576
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a 62% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/secondN/A72.0 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A119.13s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2026Dec 2025

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Modalities

Input
textimagevideofileaudio
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has cheaper output pricing at $1.50/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's score of N/A.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.
Advertise with us