Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Speed
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2026Dec 2025

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Modalities

Input
textimagevideofileaudio
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has cheaper output pricing at $1.50/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's score of 30.1.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.