Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsMiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideofile
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools's score of N/A.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.